About DECUR
Our Mission
DECUR (Data Exceeding Current Understanding of Reality) is an independent research archive for the structured documentation of UAP and NHI phenomena. The archive catalogs firsthand testimony from military, intelligence, scientific, and government sources; primary source documents and declassified records; and rigorously assessed case files spanning more than eight decades of public record.
The platform is built on the position that systematic, source-attributed documentation is a prerequisite for meaningful analysis. DECUR does not advocate for or against any explanation of UAP phenomena. Entries document what was reported, what official records state, and what physical evidence was collected. Qualitative data, catalogued for analysis rather than advocacy.
What the Archive Contains
- Key figures — firsthand accounts and career documentation for 145 individuals from military, intelligence, government, scientific, and journalistic backgrounds. Each profile includes roles, affiliations, disclosures, and primary sources.
- Documented cases — 94 UAP incidents assessed using quantitative evidence scoring. Each case file includes witness accounts, sensor data, physical evidence, official response, and competing hypotheses.
- Government programs — 26 official and private UAP research programs documented, from Project Blue Book through AATIP, AAWSAP, and AARO.
- Primary documents — 302 declassified records, congressional testimonies, and official reports, each with sourcing and context.
- Research papers — 92 peer-reviewed and preprint publications relevant to UAP research, indexed with author connections and case links.
- Historical timeline — 1,878+ events from 1561 to present, cross-referenced with figure disclosures, program histories, and congressional actions.
Evidence Scoring
All 94 documented cases are evaluated using two complementary quantitative indexes, computed from structured case data and documented in the scoring methodology. Scores reflect evidentiary weight, not attribution.
Measures documentary strength across six components: sensor/capture technology, witness credentials, corroboration breadth, physical evidence, investigation depth, and mundane explanation assessment. A high EQI means the evidence is well-documented, not that any particular explanation is correct.
Measures how anomalous reported behavior is relative to known physics and technology, across four components: kinematic anomalousness, electromagnetic and physical effects, apparent agency or awareness, and trans-medium travel. Scored independently of documentation quality.
Full ranked case list: Best Evidence Rankings.
Contact
For media inquiries and press resources, see the Press Kit. For all other inquiries, use the form below.
Disclaimer
DECUR presents information for educational and research purposes only. We neither endorse nor dismiss the claims contained within the insider testimony we archive, but rather provide a platform for organized access to this material. The accounts documented here may challenge conventional understanding and official narratives. Readers are encouraged to apply critical thinking and draw their own conclusions.