Press Kit

DECUR (Data Exceeding Current Understanding of Reality) is an open-access research archive for UAP/NHI phenomena, structured for journalists, researchers, and policy professionals who need citable, primary-sourced information. This page provides archive statistics, key documented findings, citation guidance, and contact information.

Archive by the Numbers

137
Key figures
Insiders, pilots, scientists, officials
72
Documented cases
Across 30 countries
1,868
Timeline events
1561 to present
618K+
Sighting reports
Via UFOSINT database
102
Primary documents
Declassified & official records
91
Research papers
Peer-reviewed & preprints
26
Government programs
Mapped & structured
14
Tier 1 cases
Highest evidence quality

About the Archive

DECUR is a structured, primary-sourced research archive focused on cataloging UAP phenomena with scientific rigor and methodological transparency. Every key figure profile, case entry, and document in the archive is backed by citable sources — congressional records, peer-reviewed papers, official government reports, and firsthand accounts.

The archive applies a quantitative evidence scoring system to all 72 documented cases. The Evidence Quality Index (EQI) measures sensor coverage, witness quality, physical effects, and official acknowledgment. The Behavioral Anomaly Index (BAI) scores observational signatures against the AATIP Five Observables framework. Both scores are documented in the scoring methodology.

DECUR does not publish probability estimates for extraterrestrial origin or make attribution claims beyond what official records and sworn testimony support. Findings are framed in terms of evidentiary weight, not conclusion.

Key Documented Findings

The following findings are grounded in official records, primary-sourced documents, or sworn congressional testimony. Each is citable.

The U.S. Department of Defense confirmed in 2021 that 143 UAP reports from 2004-2021 remain unexplained. 18 incidents demonstrated movement patterns or flight characteristics that suggest technological capability beyond known air vehicles.

Source: DNI Preliminary Assessment: UAP (June 2021)

David Grusch, a former NGA and NRO senior intelligence officer, testified under oath before the House Oversight Subcommittee on July 26, 2023 that the U.S. government possesses recovered non-human craft. He declined to provide details in open session citing classification.

Source: House Oversight Committee — UAP Hearing, July 26, 2023

The AATIP program, confirmed by the DoD in 2017, identified five behavioral observables in UAP that exceed current U.S. aerospace capabilities: instantaneous acceleration, hypersonic velocity without thermal signature, low observability, trans-medium travel, and positive lift without aerodynamic surfaces.

Source: AATIP Five Observables — DoD / TTSA documentation

The 2004 USS Nimitz Tic Tac encounter, the highest-scoring case in the DECUR archive (EQI 86/100), involved multiple radar systems, ATFLIR targeting pod video, and direct observation by two F/A-18 pilots. The DoD released declassified video in April 2020.

Source: DECUR Case File — USS Nimitz / Tic Tac Encounter

The USS Theodore Roosevelt encounters (2014-2015) represent the highest-scored case in the archive (EQI 87/100). Multiple pilots flying different missions reported the same class of object over an extended period; encounters were corroborated by ship radar and ATFLIR systems.

Source: DECUR Case File — USS Theodore Roosevelt Encounters

The IC Inspector General assessed David Grusch's whistleblower complaint as 'credible and urgent' in 2023. Congressional intelligence committees were formally notified and a closed-door House briefing was conducted in January 2024.

Source: ICIG Assessment — reported by The Debrief, June 2023

Top-Scored Cases

The five highest-scoring cases by Evidence Quality Index (EQI). Full case files — including evidence breakdown, witness accounts, and competing hypotheses — are available via the links below.

#CaseYearEQITier
1USS Theodore Roosevelt Encounters2014-201587.0Tier 1
2USS Nimitz / Tic Tac Encounter200486.0Tier 1
3USS Omaha USO Incident201980.0Tier 1
3RB-47 Incident195780.0Tier 1
5Belgian UFO Wave1989-199074.0Tier 1

Full scored rankings: decur.org/best-evidence

How to Cite DECUR

DECUR is a structured secondary source that compiles and annotates primary records. When citing DECUR in journalism or research, use the format below and link to the source record directly where possible. The primary source links are provided in every case file, figure profile, and document entry.

Web citation
DECUR Archive. “[Entry title].” decur.org/[path]. Accessed [date].
Example — case file
DECUR Archive. “USS Nimitz / Tic Tac Encounter.” decur.org/cases/nimitz-tic-tac. Accessed May 2026.
Example — figure profile
DECUR Archive. “David Grusch — Key Figure Profile.” decur.org/figures/david-grusch. Accessed May 2026.

Data API for Researchers

DECUR provides a public read-only JSON API for data journalists and researchers who want to programmatically access the archive. No authentication required.

Base URL
https://decur.org/api/v1/
/api/v1/casesAll 72 documented cases with metadata and evidence tier
/api/v1/cases?id=nimitz-tic-tacFull case file for a specific case
/api/v1/figuresAll 137 key figures with role and affiliation data
/api/v1/scoresEQI and BAI scores for all cases, sortable
/api/v1/scores?sort=eqi&limit=10Top 10 cases by Evidence Quality Index

What DECUR Does Not Do

Journalists and researchers should note the following explicit limits on DECUR's editorial scope:

×DECUR does not publish probability estimates for extraterrestrial, non-human, or interdimensional origin of any phenomenon.
×DECUR does not independently verify or endorse whistleblower claims. Testimonial disclosures are documented and attributed, not validated.
×DECUR does not publish unverified classified information. All case and document data is drawn from declassified or publicly available sources.
×DECUR does not operate as a news publication. Archive entries are updated when new primary sources become available, not in response to media cycles.
×The EQI and BAI scoring systems measure evidentiary weight — not likelihood of any particular explanation. A high score means high-quality evidence; it makes no claim about what the phenomenon is.

Media Contact

For media inquiries, interview requests, data licensing questions, or factual corrections, use the contact form. Responses are generally within 48-72 hours.